Essay: "O" by Tim Blake Nelson

America has developed a reputation of being an egalitarian society which after many years had brushed aside its previous reputation of oppression and racism, particularly towards the black minority. This has been through the many years of changes in values and beliefs, as well as legislation started by the civil rights movement in the 1900's. Although legally many rights have been given to the black minority, there are still many racial undertones present in society. This is because in some places social change in regards to racial vilification and discrimination is slow moving and this is seen in some southern US states that still fly the confederate flag that represented oppression and the support for slavery during the civil war. The film O is set in a southern US State – South Carolina  – and develops on this idea that the black minority are still segregated and oppressed racially even after legislative change. Racial undertones have been used in the film to demonstrate this slow moving social change and to help create conflict in the film. This can be prominently seen in the scene where Desi's father interrogates Odin about the accusations made by Rodger towards Odin in regards to his daughter. Desi's father, in this scene, asks Odin “have you ever had any run ins with the police?”. This question comments on the ethnicity of Odin, suggesting that Desi's father believes that due to the fact that he is black he has probably engaged in interaction with police. This interrogation occurs with Desi's father standing over Odin which is taken with a low angle camera shot. This emphasises that Desi’s father has power has over Odin. The racial undertones and stereotypes in conjunction with the low angle shot highlight that ‘whites’ have more power or an advantage over the black minority, even now in the modern society. This idea causes the audience to consider whether discrimination is still present even after all the legal changes and the supposed social change.

Discrimination may still be present in the modern society and this has led to the segregation of communities. Minority ethnic groups such as those of African-American background were usually depicted as being of low-socio economic status. Those of Caucasian background however have been depicted as higher socio-economic status with more privileges and freedoms. O subverts this racial stereotype and uses these expectations to develop conflict and present to the audience the disadvantage still maintained by the ethnic minorities. Odin is of African-American descent and he is within a prestigious school. This use of characters race in relation to their surroundings creates immediate conflict as the idea of individual versus society arises. He does not fit into this elite school as there is no presence of anyone else from his ethnic background. By introducing this idea of individual versus society, O establishes this hyper segregation, depicting this stereotypical view of black minorities not being able to attend such a high-class school. These ideas are extended to the scene where Desi and Odin are naked in bed together. Odin retells a fake story about his child hood “I was scared once…My mother couldn’t afford a good doctor”. Even though this story was fabricated the use of a close up shot of Odins face shows that this issue is still seiours. O emphasises through this scene that monetary disadvantage is still a real issue for many ethnic minorities. This story is told whilst Odin is naked. Odin being naked suggests that this story is “bare” or true as it is stripped of any façade or fake image. This emphasises the fact that the story’s issue of monetary segregation. Through this scene and throughout the movie, O has used racial stereotypes and  filmic techniques to introduce the audience to a not so egalitarian or equal society and presents to the audience the idea that racial and monetary segregation is still present in the modern world.


Popularity, favouritism and charisma are all elements that determine your power and social status in the modern context. Within a democratic society like America the most popular and favoured become leaders, with many often envying and being jealous of such attributes. Due to the importance of power and social status in the modern context, many people are envied due to their popularity.  The idea of jealousy and envy has been used in O through filmic techniques to demonstrate the importance of social hierarchy and popularity in the 21st century. Hugo embodies these ideas of envy and jealousy. This can be seen in the beginning of the movie during the voice-over of Hugo "All my life I wanted to fly, I wanted to live like a hawk, I know that you’re not supposed to be jealous about anything but to take flight, to soar above everyone and everything, now that’s living". Hugo admits to being jealous of the "hawk" which symbolises Odin and his popularity.  This voice is heard during the beginning scene that depicts a darkened environment. The use of darkness through pathetic fallacy foreshadows that Hugo's jealously will lead to unfortunate events. Within this scene there are white doves, which symbolise purity, innocence and peace. The use of the doves during the voice over shows the infiltration and consuming nature of jealousy, how it changes ones behaviours for the worse, causing anarchy.  This idea that jealousy can consume and overtake an individual in conjunction with the voice-over and pathetic fallacy depicts an issue of the importance of popularity and questions how easily jealousy can corrupt people in the modern context.  

If you have a burning question, or would like to featured in some way in the "Ask them from me" segment, email me at: cc3493@gmail.com. If you do not want to be featured in the "Ask them from me" featured post, please let me know in the email :)

Visit Particular Interest for more content like this!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Essay: "Frank Hurley: The Man Who Made History" by Simon Nasht

Legal and Non-Legal Responses to Housing Affordability in Australia

Legal Studies: Case Law